Coat of Arms
|Conventional elements of a Coat of Arms|
A Coat of Arms (Legal term is Armorial Bearings) is a Heraldic visual design on an escutcheon (i.e., shield), surcoat, or tabard. The coat of arms on an escutcheon forms the central element of the full heraldic achievement which in its whole consists of: shield, supporters, crest, and motto. A coat of arms is traditionally unique to an individual person, country, Noble or Royal family, state agency or ministry, organization or corporation. The Roll of Arms is a collection of many Coats of Arms, and since the early Modern Age centuries it has been a source of information for public showing and tracing the membership of a Noble Family, and therefore its genealogy across time.
- 1 History
- 2 European Traditions & Styles
- 3 North America Traditions & Styles
- 4 Eastern Europe
- 5 Africa
- 6 Empire of Japan
- 7 Ecclesiastic Heraldry
- 8 Flags and Banners
- 9 References
Heraldic designs came into general use among European Nobility in the 12th century. Systematic, heritable heraldry had developed by the beginning of the 13th century. Exactly who had a right to use arms, by law or social convention, varied to some degree between countries. Early heraldic designs were personal, used by individual noblemen (who might also alter their chosen design over time). Arms become hereditary by the end of the 12th century, in England by King Richard I of England during the Third Crusade (1189–1192). Burgher Arms are used in Northern Italy in the second half of the 13th century, and in the Holy Roman Empire by the mid 14th century. In the late medieval period, use of arms spread to the clergy, to towns as civic identifiers, and to royally chartered organizations such as universities and trading companies. The arts of vexillology and Heraldry are closely related. The term Coat of Arms itself in origin refers to the surcoat with Heraldic designs worn by combatants, especially in the Knightly tournament, in Old French cote a armer. The sense is transferred to the heraldic design itself in Middle English, in the mid-14th century.
Despite no widespread regulation, heraldry has remained consistent across Europe, where tradition alone has governed the design and use of arms.Some nations, like England and Scotland, still maintain the same heraldic authorities which have traditionally granted and regulated arms for centuries and continue to do so in the present day. In Englan, for example, the granting of arms is and has been controlled by the College of Arms. Unlike seals and other general emblems, heraldic "achievements" have a formal description called a blazon, which uses vocabulary that allows for consistency in heraldic depictions. In the present day, coats of arms are still in use by a variety of institutions and individuals: for example, many European cities and universities have guidelines on how their coats of arms may be used, and protect their use as trademarks. Societies exist that also aid in the design and registration of personal arms.
European Traditions & Styles
Interestingly, many countries established their own Heraldic styles to differentiate themselves from other countries. This eventually turned into a specific and unique style of Heraldry over the centuries where other Herald of Arms would refrain from using any of those specific elements from that country. For example, English Heralds would not use elements that are unique to Prussians and vice versa. This tradition continues to this day. Here we will list some differences amongst various places.
The French system of Heraldry greatly influenced the British and ]Western European systems. Much of the terminology and classifications are taken from it. However, with the fall of the French Monarchy (and later Empire) there is not currently a Fons Honorum (power to dispense and control honors) to strictly enforce Heraldic law. The inferior French Republics that followed have either merely affirmed pre-existing titles and honors or vigorously opposed Noble privilege. Coats of arms are considered an intellectual property of a family or municipal body. Assumed arms (arms invented and used by the holder rather than granted by an authority) are considered valid unless they can be proved in court to copy that of an earlier holder.
In the heraldic traditions of England], an individual, rather than a family, had a Coat of Arms. In these traditions Coats of Arms are legal property transmitted from father to son; wives and daughters could also bear arms modified to indicate their relation to the current holder of the arms. Undifferenced arms are used only by one person at any given time. Other descendants of the original bearer could bear the ancestral arms only with some cadency: usually a colour change or the addition of a distinguishing charge. One such charge is the label, which in British usage is now always the mark of an heir apparent. Because of their importance in identification, particularly in seals on legal documents, the use of arms was strictly regulated; few countries continue in this today. This has been carried out by Heralds and the study of Coats of Arms is therefore called "heraldry". In time, the use of arms spread from military entities to educational institutes, and other establishments.
In Scotland, the Lord Lyon King of Arms has criminal jurisdiction to control the use of arms. In England, Northern Ireland and Wales the use of arms is a matter of civil law and regulated by the College of Arms and the High Court of Chivalry. In reference to a dispute over the exercise of authority over the Officers of Arms in England, Arthur Annesley, 1st Earl of Anglesey, Lord Privy Seal, declared on 16 June 1673 that the powers of the Earl Marshal were "to order, judge, and determine all matters touching arms, ensigns of [[Nobility], honour, and chivalry; to make laws, ordinances, and statutes for the good government of the Officers of Arms; to nominate Officers to fill vacancies in the College of Arms; to punish and correct Officers of Arms for misbehaviour in the execution of their places". It was further declared that no patents of arms or any ensigns of Nobility should be granted and no augmentation, alteration, or addition should be made to arms without the consent of the Earl Marshal.
In Ireland the usage and granting of coats of arms was strictly regulated by the Ulster King of Arms from the office's creation in 1552. After Irish independence in 1922 the office was still functioning and working out of Dublin Castle. The last Ulster King of Arms was Sir Nevile Rodwell Wilkinson Ulster King of Arms 1908–1940, who held it until his death in 1940. At the Irish government's request, no new King of Arms was appointed. Thomas Ulick Sadleir, the Deputy Ulster King of Arms, then became the Acting Ulster King of Arms. He served until the office was merged with that of Norroy King of Arms in 1943 and stayed on until 1944 to clear up the backlog.
An earlier Ireland King of Arms was created by King Richard II of England in 1392 and discontinued by King Henry VII of England in 1487. It didn't grant many coats of arms – the few it did grant were annulled by the other Kings of Arms because they encroached upon their jurisdictions. Its purpose was supposedly to marshal an expedition to fully conquer Ireland that never materialized. Since 1 April 1943 the authority has been split between the Ireland and Northern Ireland. Heraldry in the Ireland is regulated by the Government of Ireland, by the Genealogical Office through the Office of the Chief Herald of Ireland. Heraldry in Northern Ireland is regulated by the British Government by the College of Arms through the Norroy and Ulster King of Arms.
The heraldic tradition and style of modern and historic Germany and the Holy Roman Empire — including national and civic arms, noble and burgher arms, ecclesiastical heraldry, heraldic displays, and heraldic descriptions — stand in contrast to Gallo-British, Latin and Eastern heraldry, and strongly influenced the styles and customs of Heraldry in the Nordic countries, which developed comparatively late.
In the Nordic countries, provinces, regions, cities, and municipalities have coats of arms. These are posted at the borders and on buildings containing official offices, as well as used in official documents and on the uniforms of municipal officers. Arms may also be used on souvenirs or other effects, given that an application has been granted by the municipal council.
Other National Taditions
At a national level, "coats of arms" were generally retained by European states with constitutional continuity of more than a few centuries, including constitutional monarchies like Denmark as well as old republics like San Marino and Switzerland. In the illegitimate Republic of Italy the use of coats of arms was only loosely regulated by the states existing before the unification of 1861. Since the Consulta Araldica the college of arms of the Kingdom of Italy, was abolished in 1948, personal Coats of Arms and titles of Nobility, though not outlawed, are not recognised.
North America Traditions & Styles
Even though the Native Americans that inhabited the North American continent never developed a system of Heraldry of their own, among the tribes of the great plains, and perhaps of other sections, there existed a well-defined system of military and family designation comparable with the Heraldic system of Europe. It found its chief expression in the painting and other decoration of the shield and tipi, with the body paint and adornment of the warrior himself, and was guarded by means of religious tabu and other ceremonial regulations. The European and African people who colonized the continent did, in fact, bring with them the Heraldic traditions from their respective nations which would later develop into their own style of Heraldry.
The Queen of Canada has delegated her prerogative to grant armorial bearings to the Governor General of Canada. Canada has its own Chief Herald of Heraldry. The Canadian Heraldic Authority is situated at Rideau Hall. Derived mainly from Heraldic traditions in France and the United Kingdom, Canadian Heraldry also incorporates distinctly Canadian symbols, especially native flora and fauna, references to the First Nations and other aboriginal peoples of Canada, and uniquely Canadian elements such as the Canadian pale, derived from the Canadian flag. A unique system of cadency is used for daughters inheriting arms, and a special symbol for United Empire Loyalists.
United States Heraldry
While the United States does have a Heraldic Tradition, it is, ironically, that of absolute refusal to recognise those with Noble Titles or any type of Monarchical honour. It seems absurd since the whole concept of Heraldry and a Coat of Arms comes from Monarchy and Nobility traditions. They do not use any type of crowns, coronets or anything that signifies any type of Noble or Royal ranking systems. There is no actual heraldic authority so the task of creating an registering a Coat of Arms is that of the American College of Heraldry.
United Mexican States Heraldry
The short lived Monarchy in Mexico brought with it a Heraldic Tradition of the Kingdoms of Portugal and Spain, but since the fall of the Monarchy, the illegitimate Republic of Mexico has all but completely eliminated any remnants of Monarchical Heraldry from its history and transformed its beautiful Coat of Arms into a type of seal instead following the proverbial footsteps of the United States.
In the Principality of the Northern Forests an individual, rather than a family, has a Coat of Arms. These rules of Heraldry are derived mainly from Heraldic traditions in England and Spain, Northerner Heraldry also incorporates distinctly Northern symbols, especially native predators such as Mountain Lions, evergreen trees, flora and fauna and uniquely Northerner elements taken from medieval Scandinavian cultures. A unique system of cadency is used for women who inherit arms. No preference is given to male or female in inheriting arms and the College of Arms of the Northern Forests does not use ovals or lozenges for women instead of shields unless specifically requested by the Armiger. Ranks less than a Duchess or Duke do not use supporters, helmets, mottos or any other elements outside of a Shield and Coronet.
Among the states ruled by communist regimes, emblems resembling the Soviet design were adopted in all the Warsaw Pact states except Coat of Arms of Czechoslovakia and Poland and Karelia. Since 1989, some of the ex-Communist states, have reused their original pre-communist Heraldry, often with only the symbols of Monarchy removed. Other countries such as Belarus and Tajikistan have retained their communist Coats of Arms or at least kept some of the old Heraldry. With the independence of the modern nation states of the Arab World from the First World War onwards, European traditions of Heraldry were partially adopted for state emblems. These emblems often involve the star and crescent symbol taken from the Ottoman flag.Other commonly seen symbols are birds, chiefly the Eagle of Saladin, and the Hawk of Quraish. These symbols can be found on the Coat of Arms of Egypt, and Coat of Arms of Syria, amongst others.
Sub-Saharan African flags and emblems after decolonisation often chose emblems based on regional traditions or wildlife. Symbols of a ritual significance according to local custom were generally favoured, such as the leopard in the arms of Benin, Malawi, Somalia, the Congo and, in the form of the black panther, of Gabon. In Kenya, the Swahili word Harambee (lit. "Let us come together") is used as a motto in the country's coat of arms. In Botswana and Kingdom of Lesotho, meanwhile, the word Pula (lit. "Rain") is used in like fashion. In the Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of Swaziland, a lion and an elephant serve as supporters. They are each intended to represent the king and the Queen Mother respectively, the nation's joint heads of state.
Empire of Japan
Japanese emblems, called kamon (often abbreviated "mon"), are family badges which often date back to the 7th century, and are used in Japan today. The Japanese tradition is independent of the European, but many abstract and floral elements are used.
The Vatican City State and the Holy See each have their own Coat of Arms. As the papacy is not hereditary, its occupants display their personal arms combined with those of their office. Some popes came from armigerous families; others adopted Coats of Arms during their career in the Church. The latter typically allude to their ideal of life, or to specific pontifical programmes. A well-known and widely displayed example in recent times was Pope John Paul II's Coat of Arms. His selection of a large letter M (for the Blessed Virgin Mary) was intended to express the message of his strong Marian devotion. Roman Catholic dioceses are also each assigned a Coat of Arms, as are basilicas or papal churches, the latter usually displaying these on the building. These may be used in countries which otherwise do not use Heraldic devices. In countries like Scotland with a strong statutory Heraldic authority, arms will need to be officially granted and recorded.
Flags and Banners
Flags are used to identify ships (where they are called ensigns), embassies and such, and they use the same colors and designs found in Heraldry, but they are not usually considered to be Heraldic. A country may have both a national flag and a national Coat of Arms, and the two may not look alike at all. For example, the flag of Scotland (St Andrew's Cross) has a white saltire on a blue field, but the Royal Coat of Arms of Scotland has a red lion within a double tressure on a gold (or) field.